The intersection between corporations and certain geopolitical landscapes has become a focal point within public discourse. Notably, the integration of renowned fashion and beauty brands with entities involved in supporting or investing in Israeli operations in occupied territories has sparked a global conversation.
Advocates and consumers alike express their concerns through actions such as refraining from purchasing, endorsing, or affiliating with products and brands linked to these contentious relationships. The following details aim to illuminate brands associated with these affiliations, highlighting recommended actions in alignment with those advocating for ethical consumer choices.
The explicit backing of Israel by American Eagle, prominently displayed on their Times Square billboard, aligns the brand with the polarizing geopolitical landscape. Opting out of their products or employment opportunities might be seen as a form of expression against these affiliations.
Bulgari / Bvlgari
Bulgari’s association with LVMH and substantial investments in Israeli companies by Bernard Arnault underscore the brand’s geopolitical connections. Choosing to avoid Bulgari products or associations may signal a stance against these affiliations.
As a part of LVMH and given Bernard Arnault’s substantial investments in Israeli companies, Celine’s geopolitical position urges consumers to contemplate their support for the brand and related employment opportunities.
Alain Wertheimer’s stance on the Israel-Gaza conflict and the associated financial commitments spotlight the geopolitical positioning of Chanel. Electing not to engage with Chanel’s products or endorse its job opportunities may signify a position on these affiliations.
Despite past disputes, L’Oreal’s connection with Diesel Frangrances and its alignment with Israel situates the brand within a geopolitical context. Consumers may choose not to support this brand to signify their stance.
Dior / Christian Dior
Bernard Arnault’s significant investments in Israeli companies and Dior’s ownership by LVMH place the brand within the geopolitical spectrum. This context may impact consumer choices regarding Dior products and related job opportunities.
Explore more brands and companies in your country using this Israeli Product Checker tool.
The link between DKNY and LVMH, along with Bernard Arnault’s investments in Israeli companies, provides a geopolitical backdrop for consumers to consider when interacting with the brand or its job opportunities.
Fendi, owned by LVMH and tied to Bernard Arnault’s notable investments in Israeli companies, positions the brand within a geopolitical context. This association might influence consumer decisions to avoid supporting or seeking employment within the brand.
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna
LVMH’s significant investments in Israeli companies and Fenty’s partial ownership under this conglomerate contextualize the brand geopolitically. Individuals might choose not to engage with Fenty Beauty products or related job opportunities aligned with it.
Giorgio Armani Beauty
Despite past geopolitical concerns, Armani’s collaboration with L’Oreal places the brand within certain geopolitical alliances. This context might influence consumer choices regarding their support for the brand or opportunities for employment.
Under LVMH and Bernard Arnault’s ownership, Givenchy’s significant investments in Israeli companies place the brand within a geopolitical landscape. Choosing to abstain from purchasing Givenchy products or engaging with the brand and its parent company could reflect a stance on these affiliations.
Linked to LVMH and Bernard Arnault’s investments in Israeli companies, Hublot operates within this geopolitical context. Opting not to buy or sell Hublot products or partake in employment within the brand or its parent company may signify a position on these affiliations.
Under LVMH and owned by Bernard Arnault, Kenzo’s connections to substantial investments in Israeli companies form a geopolitical backdrop. Deciding not to buy or sell Kenzo products or take part in its employment might reflect a stance on these affiliations.
With LVMH as its parent company and significant investments by Bernard Arnault in Israeli companies, Loewe’s geopolitical context could influence consumer decisions. Refraining from the purchase or sale of Loewe products or job opportunities aligned with the brand or LVMH could signify a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
Belonging to LVMH, Louis Vuitton is linked with substantial investments in Israeli companies by its owner, Bernard Arnault. Consumers choosing to refrain from buying or selling Louis Vuitton products or engaging in employment related to the brand and its parent company might reflect a stance on these affiliations.
Maison Francis Kurkdjian
As part of LVMH and with Bernard Arnault’s significant investments in Israeli companies, Maison Francis Kurkdjian exists within this geopolitical landscape. Abstaining from the purchase or sale of its products or employment within the brand or its parent company might reflect a stance on such affiliations.
Maison Margiela Fragrances
L’Oreal’s partnership with Maison Margiela Fragrances, amidst the company’s association with Israel and its apologies following previous disputes, frames this brand within a geopolitical context. Choosing not to purchase or sell these products or engage in employment associated with L’Oreal signifies a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
Under LVMH and with the considerable investments by Bernard Arnault in Israeli companies, Marc Jacobs is situated within this geopolitical context. Opting not to buy or sell Marc Jacobs products or engage in employment opportunities related to the brand or its parent company might signify a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
Aligned with L’Oreal and its historical disputes involving Israel, Mugler Beauty stands within this geopolitical context. Individuals might choose not to purchase or sell these products or pursue employment with L’Oreal to reflect a stance on these affiliations.
L’Oreal’s partnership with Prada Beauty following disputes with the Arab League places the brand within a geopolitical context. Refraining from buying or selling these products or engaging in employment with L’Oreal signifies a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
The sportswear brand sponsors athletes and teams across various sports, but its main sponsorship of the Israel Football Association has prompted concerns. A boycott stance has been proposed, urging individuals to avoid buying Puma products until the brand discontinues its sponsorship of the IFA and Israeli teams in illegal settlements. Refraining from working for Puma has been suggested.
Ralph Lauren Frangrances
Part of L’Oreal, Ralph Lauren Frangrances became entangled in geopolitical disputes after their cooperation with a pro-Israel figure. Individuals are encouraged to avoid purchasing or selling Ralph Lauren fragrances and to refrain from working for L’Oreal Groupe due to their engagements in Occupied Palestine.
Due to the public pro-Israel stance of the company’s president, Michael S Greenberg, Skechers has faced controversy. To show dissent, individuals have been advised against buying or selling Skechers products and suggested not to work for the Skechers Groupe due to these associations.
Skims, established by Kim Kardashian, received attention due to her comments about specific operations but not Israel’s actions. The call to boycott Skims products and avoid selling them has been proposed, along with the suggestion to refrain from working for the brand.
STELLA by Stella McCartney
As part of Bernard Arnault’s LVMH and its investments in Israeli companies, the brand’s association raises geopolitical concerns. To address these, consumers are encouraged to avoid buying or selling STELLA by Stella McCartney products and advised not to engage in employment with the brand or its parent company, LVMH.
Part of LVMH under Bernard Arnault, TAG Heuer’s connections to substantial investments in Israeli companies align it within this geopolitical landscape. The recommendation has been made to refrain from buying or selling TAG Heuer products and to avoid working for TAG Heuer or LVMH due to these geopolitical connections.
Ted Baker, a UK-based clothing retailer, partnered with Delta Galil, which raised concerns regarding ethical alignment. The call to action suggests avoiding the purchase or sale of Ted Baker products unless they discontinue their partnership with Delta Galil or any other Israeli manufacturers. It also advises against seeking employment with the brand.
Tiffany & Co.
Owned by Bernard Arnault’s LVMH, Tiffany & Co. falls under the banner of extensive investments in Israeli companies. To express disapproval of such associations, individuals are encouraged to avoid purchasing or selling Tiffany & Co. products and advised not to work for the brand or LVMH.
As part of L’Oreal’s extensive involvement with Israel, Valentino Beauty was implicated in controversies arising from this partnership. To reflect a stance against such associations, refraining from purchasing or selling Valentino Beauty products and avoiding employment with L’Oreal Groupe has been recommended.
Viktor & Rolf Beauty
Partnered with L’Oreal, Viktor & Rolf Beauty found itself amid controversies due to L’Oreal’s alignment with Israel. To express dissent, consumers and retailers are encouraged to avoid buying or selling Viktor & Rolf Beauty products and to refrain from working for L’Oreal Groupe.
Yves Saint Laurent Beauty / YSL Beauty
Part of the L’Oreal and Israel controversy, YSL Beauty came under scrutiny due to its association with the conglomerate. In response, the suggested course of action is to abstain from buying or selling YSL Beauty products and to avoid employment with L’Oreal Groupe due to its affiliations with Israel.
Consumer choices regarding the brands they purchase, sell, or associate with play a significant role in reflecting ethical standards. As seen in the breakdown of these associations, the decision to avoid brands affiliated with entities investing or supporting Israeli operations emphasizes the public’s stand for ethical, socially responsible business practices.
The call for consumer awareness and conscientious action remains pivotal in the ongoing discourse surrounding geopolitical affiliations of major global brands.